温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.5rb.com/case/westcott-v-westcott
点击访问原文链接

Westcott v Westcott - 5RB Barristers

进入原网站 导航首页
Westcott v Westcott - 5RB Barristers Call 5RB+44 (0)20 7242 2902 Menu About us Our work People Barristers Support team Recruitment Resources Cases News Publications Articles 5RB Talks Links Contact Contact us Enquiry Visit us Urgent injunctions Complaints procedure Register for 5RB updates Barristers Cases Westcott v Westcott Reference: [2007] EWHC 2501 (QB)

Court: Queen's Bench Division

Judge: Richard Parkes QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge)

Date of judgment: 30 Oct 2007 Summary: Defamation - Libel - Slander - Defences - Absolute privilege - Complaints to police

Download: Download this judgment

Instructing Solicitors: John Stallard & Co for C; BP Collins for D

Facts C was a Justice of the Peace. D was married to C’s son, though the marriage had broken down. After a visit to C’s home, D alleged to the police orally, and later in a written statement, that C had attacked her and her baby son, hitting her at least seven times and the baby at least twice.

C brought proceedings for libel and slander. D pleaded defences of justification and absolute, alternatively qualified, privilege. C admitted qualified privilege but pleaded malice in reply. The parties agreed that the question of absolute privilege should be determined as a preliminary issue.

Issue Whether D’s publications to the police were published on occasions of absolute privilege.

Held The publications were published on occasions of absolute privilege and the claim was struck out. Following Buckley v Dalziel, D’s written statement to the police was protected by absolute privilege and immunity from suit. It followed that her initial oral statement was also protected, for otherwise the object of the protection of the later written statement would be wholly undermined and could easily be outflanked and rendered of little use.

Comment The position in defamation of complainants to the police had been uncertain for many years, with Gatley on Libel and Slander stating that they have “traditionally” only been protected by qualified privilege. The question has now been addressed twice by the High Court in six months, with the result that both written and oral statements by complainants are now protected by absolute privilege.

Links JP fears assault claim hit reputation - Telegraph
Magistrate's libel bid thrown out - BBC

Share Quick linksUrgent advice Enquiry Register for 5RB updates Latest news 5RB Hosts BVL, PASS and MTAttB Placement Students Read more

Judgment in TPI on Meaning in Belafonte v NGN Read more

High Court hears the first application to strike out a claim as a SLAPP under CPR 3.4(2)(d) Read more

Jonathan Scherbel-Ball reappointed to Advisory Council on National Records and Archives Read more

Phone hacking limitation trial begins Read more

TPI on Meaning in Belafonte v NGN Read more

£50,000 damages and an injunction awarded in TikTok libel claim Read more

Sunday Times granted transparency order in care proceedings about fabricated or induced illness Read more

View news archive Latest cases Bradley v CM & others [2026] EWHC 125 (Fam)

Optosafe Limited & Anr v Robertson [2026] EWHC 12 (KB) [2026] EWHC 12 (KB)

Blake v Fox [2025] EWCA Civ 1321

Solicitor General v Yaxley-Lennon [2024] EWHC 2732 (KB), [2025] EWCA Civ 476 [2025] EWCA Civ 476

Wei & Ors v Long & Ors [2025] EWHC 158 (KB) [2025] EWHC 158 (KB)

Iqbal v Geo TV Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 1566

View all cases Follow us @5RB Email* EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. 5 Gray’s Inn Square Gray’s Inn London WC1R 5AH T 020 7242 2902

Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board

Site Map Privacy Policy Disclaimer Credits

智能索引记录